I sometimes get the feeling that behind some of the rush to get involved in a “fresh expression” of church is not so much the passionate desire to incarnate mission so much as to get out of the straitjacket of church structures and the fact that a local church is more often than not made up of people one may not naturally choose as friends!
However, I have a growing feeling that we might be missing the point. Jesus, after prayer, appointed 12 people who were regularly at each others throats and had major disagreements. There were problems between greek speaking and Aramaic speaking jews in the first church at Jerusalem which were not conveniently answered by “multiplying” into 2 congregations. The church at Antioch which first sent out Paul and Barnabas on mission had a very diverse leadership group if you research it. The church at Corinth whilst overflowing with spiritual gifts had major tensions in the ranks but no desire to form several “new churches” (one of Apollos, one of Cephas, one of Paul and one of Christ) to deal with their disagreements. Early Churches also had the social tensions which only a slave owning community could imagine. How does a roman “master” recognise a slave as his brother or even elder? That’s without a debate on the role of women!
Yet it was into this notion of the “one church” community, warts and all, that Jesus and Paul’s teaching on unity is given. “We are all one in Christ Jesus”. It seems to me that today we may think unity is best served by endorsing social or mindset divisions. A solution is to put those people together who think the same, whose lifestyles are similar, whose jobs are alike and who have similarly ages families. Instead of wrestling with our differences and “preferring one another” , “serving one another”, “denying ourselves”, and “walking humbly with our God” we choose to take possibly an easier road. This might be a pragmatic solution, but maybe its really attaching a veneer of unity to the church. Maybe we don’t wrestle as we should with the challenge of preserving the unity of the Spirit with those whom we disagree with. It takes a life of sacrifice. However difficult the road less travelled is, I do think we miss out on the creative tension that occurs on it, and there is so much we can learn when we are able to agree to disagree with one another.